Connect with us

OPINION

OPINION: The tragic case of Albert Ojwang: Upholding the Rights of Arrested Persons in Kenya

Published

on

The rights enshrined in Article 49 of the Constitution of Kenya are not merely legal formalities; they are fundamental safeguards designed to protect individuals from the potential abuses of power by law enforcement agencies.

Recent events, particularly the tragic death of Albert Ojwang, while in custody at Nairobi Central Police Station, underscore the urgent necessity for these rights to be respected and upheld.

Firstly, it is imperative that every arrested individual is informed promptly—and in a language they understand—of the reasons for their arrest.

This right is crucial not only for ensuring transparency but also for allowing individuals to comprehend the situation they find themselves in.

Equally important is the right to remain silent and to be made aware of the implications of waiving that right.

Such measures are essential in preventing coerced confessions and ensuring that justice prevails.

The case of Ojwang raises troubling questions about the treatment of suspects within our justice system.

His death is a stark reminder that without accountability, the very institutions designed to protect citizens can become instruments of harm.

It is vital that security agencies adhere strictly to constitutional mandates to foster trust between the public and law enforcement.

Furthermore, the Constitution guarantees arrested individuals the right to legal assistance and communication with advocates.

This right must be honoured without exception, as it is a cornerstone of a fair judicial process.

Individuals should not feel isolated or intimidated when navigating the complexities of the legal system; rather, they should have access to the necessary support to defend their rights.

The requirement that arrested persons be brought before a court within 24 hours is another critical aspect of Article 49.

Delays in arraignment can lead to unnecessary suffering and erode public confidence in our judicial system.

The provision that individuals cannot be held in custody for minor offenses—those punishable by fines or short sentences—further underscores the principle that liberty should be the norm, not the exception.

Moreover, the right to petition for a review of detention is essential for ensuring that no one is held unlawfully.

This mechanism serves as a vital check on the power of the state, ensuring that individuals can challenge their detention and seek justice.

It is also the responsibility of Parliament to enact legislation that upholds the humane treatment of all detained persons.

This legislation must reflect international human rights standards, ensuring that Kenya’s commitment to human dignity is not just theoretical but practised.

In conclusion, the rights of arrested individuals are fundamental to the integrity of our justice system.

The tragic death of Albert Ojwang should serve as a catalyst for reform, prompting a renewed commitment from all stakeholders to uphold these rights. Only through vigilance and adherence to constitutional mandates can we ensure a just society where the rule of law prevails, and every individual is treated with the dignity they deserve.

Comments

Your comments here:

error

Share it with your friends